Assassin’s Creed: Disappointment

Ladies and Jellyspoons. Here is my review of Assassin’s Creed: Revelations

Assassin’s Creed: Revelations made me cry a little inside. I was so looking forward to, and almost as a result, so let down by this game. By the time I’d finished it I wasn’t even sure of my opinion of it, which is a shame because as a rule the Assassin’s Creed games are awesome. AssCreedII still stands as the pinnacle but Brotherhood, I thought, was pretty darn good in itself, even if it was more like AssCreed2.5 rather than its own game.

I’d put a spoiler at the start of this review but to be honest, for those of you who don’t want me to ruin the most recent Assassin’s Creed game for you, but Fear Not! They’ve already beaten me to it.

Many of my emotions were toyed with throughout my time with this game that, by the end, I honestly couldn’t tell if I loved it or hated it. I admit that I love the Assassin’s Creed series and have since before it was cool (I thoroughly enjoyed the first game in spite of its many flaws), and I confess that I’m more than happy with an annual release as long as a game is good. Brotherhood was a great example of this; it came out only a year after Assassin’s Creed II and still managed to be very good on all fronts. So what happened with Revelations?

One of the biggest complaints about annual release schedules in the game industry is that it’s almost impossible to make a game in such a short amount of time without suffering from stagnantcy, glitches, or a lack of content. While Assassin’s Creed: Revelations manages to give you more than your money’s worth in content, it is a rather significant disappointment on the other two fronts. The game is a glitchy mess and the new content is not only useless, but sometimes an annoying distraction from the rest of the game. I understand that tower defense is kind of a big deal right now, but you really shouldn’t force that kind of gameplay mechanic in to a game like Assassin’s Creed; it really breaks up the experience.

That’s the biggest change to the game this time around, a rather frustrating tower defense mini-game. Instead of Borgia towers, this time around you have to take down the Templar dens. The twist is that, even after you’ve taken out their leader and gained their territory, they can take it back. While you’re gallivanting about Constantinople, killing Templars and flirting with locals, you may get a message telling you that one of your dens is contested. You then have to walk all the way across town to get to that den, where you command your own assassins to protect your den against the attacking Templars. You have a bunch of different assassin types that you can put on the rooftops around you and you can also put up defensive barriers with cannons and flamethrowers on the ground. It sounds good on the surface but in practice it’s a mess. The controls are clunky, the camera is unwieldy, and it’s persistently frustrating since the last wave is pretty damn close to impossible to protect against without a perfectly assembled team. It’s not fun, and the complete disconnect from the rest of the gameplay is disconcerting, especially since I could easily walk down there and kill every last Templar myself with a better success rate.

The part that bothered me the most is that without fail it always seemed to be that the Templar den farthest away from me was the one that was contested, meaning it took forever to get there for fear of losing my territory. This was made worse by the fact that there were no horses to get you there so you had to run. Sure there are sewers to quick-teleport you around town this time around – same as in Brotherhood – but I had completely forgotten about them because they were never once mentioned in-game. While the tower defense segments were boring and frankly annoying, at least you can take some bit of solace in knowing that, if you lose, you can basically walk right back in and take back the territory. By the end of the game, I was doing all I could (bribing heralds) to keep the amount of tower defense interruptions to a minimum, or I’d let them win on purpose just so I could kill their leader and get back to the real game.

There are a few other additions to gameplay as well, but really nothing significant. This time around you get a hook blade, which allows you to slide down zip-lines and jump higher when climbing buildings. This was little more than aesthetic since I rarely used the zip-lines and most of the building-climbing action was practically identical to the previous iterations. The other addition is the ability to create and use bombs. You get three types of bomb: Offensive, tactical, and diversionary; they’re all actually useful in their own right but almost impossible to use mid-fight, meaning that they never get used, so the various ingredients you get along the way pile up fast. This is disheartening because instead of large sums of money, the primary loot you get when finding treasure chests or looting enemies are bomb ingredients.

Other than that, the game is basically the same as II and Brotherhood. You’re still climbing buildings and enjoying some pretty intense free-running; the combat is the same, apart from a couple of pretty groovy kill animations that you get thanks to the hook-blade; and the property management is identical to Brotherhood rather than II. Basically it’s more of the same, which can certainly be a problem if you’re looking for innovation. We had Assassin’s Creed II, which was a great game. Then we got Brotherhood which was more or less just Assassin’s Creed II.5. This game, I guess is basically AssCreed II.75. Thing is, I don’t mind more of the same as long as it’s more of the same quality material, or if the story is good. Sadly, the game is full of persistent issues, so that ruins what could have been an enjoyable experience.

First and foremost, I found the controls to be broken, which is weird since I felt the controls were really good in the previous titles. Climbing buildings seems like a total crap-shoot most of the time, where you’ll press the stick in the direction you need to go, and he won’t move, or you’ll try to jump up and instead jump away from the building, falling to your death. Combat was broken as well, since more enemies have guns this time around and when you need to take that guy with the rifle out before he headshots you, Ezio still insists on lunging towards the insignificant guys with the pocket knives. I never had these issues in previous games, so I know it’s not my own fault. I died plenty of times at the hands of the poor controls, and that alone almost makes the game too frustrating to enjoy.

But that’s not all! In addition to the poor controls and gameplay features, the game is also a technical mess. I can handle visual glitches, instances where textures refuse to load, animations go berserk, or character models disappear and reappear before your eyes (of which there are plenty), but the problem is when the game itself breaks and you have to reset or abort your current mission. There were over a half-dozen times I had to restart my game because Ezio got stuck in a wall, or the tower defense game refused to continue due to one of the assassins being caught on a polygon, or falling through a pillar into the nether-world. I realize this game is classified as a sandbox, and I understand that when you have that much content to go through it’s hard to make sure everything works flawlessly, but Brotherhood didn’t have any of these issues and it had the same time constraints, so there’s no excuse for this. I’m sorry, but I have a hard time forgiving a game that’s so fundamentally broken that I can barely play it without fear of it breaking. Luckily I was unable to recreate any of the game-freezing bugs, so I don’t think they’re too persistent; I’m under the impression that I’m the unlucky minority.

But enough with the bad parts of the game,

Like previous games in the series, Revelations packs a ton of content. In addition to the story, which on its own lasts 10-12 hours, there’s literally hundreds of things to keep you busy, including treasures to find, property to acquire, data fragments to collect, and side missions to do – just like in previous games. I didn’t even come close to getting all the content and I easily spent more than 30 hours with the game’s single player campaign alone. There’s also an updated multiplayer mode, which is still really unique and interesting, but I can’t really see it having any sort of longevity. I played a few dozen matches and I really have no need or desire to ever play it again. It was a great experience, but I’ve got stuff to do. I am also not a fan of the fact that you need to sign up for an online pass to play the vs mode, but this is neither the time nor place to rant about online passes.

Though to be honest, I think the thing that I like most about Assassin’s Creed is the story. Yeah, the combat is usually satisfying and free-running is better in this series than any other, but I keep returning to the series to see more about this deep and involving plot that has been woven across generations and eras. It’s not the kind of story for everyone, in fact it’s so religiously motivated that the game has to put a disclaimer at the beginning assuring people that it was created by a team of developers of varying religions and faiths, but I like it! While I’m not going to spoil the story for the previous games, I will tell you that this time around we’re seeing a nice end to the stories of both Ezio and Altair. It’s cool to see both of them in their later years, and how they reflect on their lives, since they were both such important figures to the assassins. It’s also kind of mind-bending to see Desmond looking back into Ezio’s life as Ezio is looking back to Altair’s life to discover the secrets of the Apple of Eden. It’s all really trippy, but it makes for a glorious epilogue to the stories of two legends in the world’s canon.

But the problem is that they’re just that: epilogues. We’ve already seen both protagonists during the important, interesting times of their lives, we spent entire games exploring those periods. We’ve seen Altair learn the truth about the Creed, and the nature of the Apple. We’ve seen Ezio rise to the challenge of his family and unite the Brotherhood. Now all we have to do is watch as they live out the winters of their lives; hell, even the NPC’s have to remind you how old you are from time to time. While the story was wonderfully told and surprisingly touching, there’s no denying that the plot could have been handled just fine without having to inflate the game to be 30 hours long through the use of side quests. The parts of the game where you take control of Altair were remarkably linear, and I truly think the whole game would have been better that way, since it was such a simple and concise plot to work through.

In addition to witnessing the ends of the lives of Ezio and Altair, you’re also fighting to de-fragment Desmond’s mind, which cropped up after the events at the end of Brotherhood. Basically, Desmond is in a coma, only kept alive in the animus, where he has to not only unlock the secrets of Ezio and Altair, but also fix himself by finding those pieces of fragmented data. The more of them you collect, the more of Desmond’s past can be unlocked. Few games are able to tell a story very well, most games are content to tell you the princess is in another castle, but the Assassin’s Creed series offers the kind of depth that reminds you that games can tell stories too, and sometimes they’re really, REALLY good. You just have to pay attention, there’s a lot to go through.

Doubly so since the game’s production values (save the glitches) are top-notch. The world that Ubisoft has concocted is easily one of the most beautiful, living worlds I’ve seen in a game, bar none. I think the one thing that impressed me most was when I was running past a graveyard, and I saw a couple hugging each other, crying into each other over the loss of their son. It wasn’t part of the mission I was doing, I didn’t even have to go through that graveyard to get to my destination, yet I saw a surprisingly human experience in this digital world and that image has stuck with me to the end of my time with Ezio. I’m also remarkably impressed with the character and costume design! I know game award shows don’t give prizes in the category of “best dressed”, but if they did, the Assassin’s Creed series would win every year. No other game comes close to the fidelity and authenticity of the costume design here.

Regardless of the plot and production values, I have a hard time recommending Assassin’s Creed: Revelations. I want to, because I’m a big fan of the series, but the annoyingly regular glitches and the: *good idea but don’t do it again* tower defense mini game really sort of ruined it. Its one of those games where you should wait until it’s on sale or at least second-hand, by then they might have a patch to fix some of the problems and you’ll be getting it cheap, so it’s a win for everyone.

Thank you for reading, there will be more reviews coming soon. Until then, I’ve been Dom Giles and this has been my review of Assassin’s Creed: Revelations.


Battle in a Field

What’s up WordPress!

It’s the 2nd of January and I fancy throwing up my review of Battlefield 3 I did a little while back on my old blog, just to see if I can get a little feed back on my questionable review skills. It didn’t work out so well before but let’s have another crack at it.

Soo here goes, my attempt at reviewing Battlefield 3:

Recently I was playing the much anticipated Battlefield 3 on my xbox 360 and I have to say I enjoyed it. I don’t think it was anything out of the ordinary as far as FPS’s go these days and to be honest, having not played any other “real” battlefield console games, since the Bad Co. games apparently don’t count, I don’t really see what the big deal is. I have yet to play the new CoD: MW3 but from what I can see and have been told, it’s basically a reboxing of the last two modern warfare games so also nothing really special or surprising there.

BUT I digress.

My honest opinion of this game, as much as it would anger your average battlefield player, is that I really couldn’t find much of a difference between this and any CoD game I’ve played recently or even the non-battlefield spin-offs: Bad Co. 1 and 2. With the exception of a couple of different button assignings there isn’t a lot of obvious differences between this and Black Ops, including some fairly similar level designs that were clearly inspired by previous games, and as for the story, well yea, level’s start and finish with a guy talking his superiors through the events that lead up to a specific, usually life altering event. Isn’t that exactly what Bl’ops was focused on?

I will give BF3 its due, there are a couple of little thing’s that got my attention, for example, there is a level based in the back seat of a fighter jet (necessary vehicle level), and I couldn’t help but oogle the gorgeous scenery, this is a very pretty game without question. The story is exactly what I expected it to be but then they all are pretty much the same nowadays. Bad dude doing bad stuff, you, the good dudes, come to save the day, cover everything from deserts, to forests, to city scenes in the map building, throw in a journey of self discovery and a vehicle mission or two, loose a couple of men towards the end then defeat the big bad dude and you have every First Person Shooter of the last couple of years…

It begs the question; Are there any original games anymore?

It makes me wonder how Nintendo have got away with this over the years really, because lets me honest, they have about four or five games that they just constantly rehash and rebox and release every year for the last I dont know how long. I’m not knocking them for it because everyone loves a bit of Nintendo every now and again. I still break out my old N64 on occasion because some of those games are absolute classics, the likes of which have not been seen since. However this doesn’t change the fact that outside of Mario and chums (this includes the Sega friends), Zelda, Star Fox and now Pokemon (excluding cross-platform titles), what else does Nintento have?

This is in no way a knock on them, I have much love for Nintendo, I’m just saying, I’d kill for their publicist.

Anyways, back to my previous point of discussion. So Battlefield 3, great game, nothing new or special, but still an awesome game so go buy or at least rent it. Let’s be honest, noone really cares about the single player campaign anyway, it’s all about the multiplayer, but thats another discussion for another blog.

I’ll give it 8/10 explodable walls.

That’s probably enough from me for now. Since I was thinking of maybe making game reviews one of my things on here I figure why not get in early. I’ll work on it and we’ll see in future posts.

Please leave any feedback or constructive criticism, or abuse, in the comments below, And on that note I think I’ll call it a night.

To those who read, Thank You, to those who didn’t, I’m under the carpet…

Ciao for now

Dom Giles, Out!